This blog is an updated equivalent to a journal where records, pictures and comments on my assignments are to be shared with my peers, professor, and the world.
The photo above is a grid project that was made with bottle caps. In total the number of bottle caps used to make this piece is 63. The bottle caps come from 14 different drinks. These bottle caps are just a few of the many I have collected with the intention of using for a future project. Each one is significant of a memory that has occurred over the past 3 years, both good and bad. Personally, I enjoy the idea of this project. Using unconventional items to create a grid pattern had sparked creativity amongst the class. It was impressive to see what other students had come up with, in particular, there were projects made from baked goods. Other designs featured candy, Post-it notes, and Solo cups. Of all of the various drinks represented above, my favorite was Cusqueña, a Peruvian beer with the bottle shown in the top right corner. The image shown on the bottle cap is of Machu Picchu, the Incan citadel set high in the Andes Mountains in Peru. Although it is rare to find at most establishments, it can still be found in America. To many who have had the pleasure of having this drink, it is a comfort that can be enjoyed in North America not only South America.
Above is a depiction of what a Minstrel show performer would generally look like
(Courtesy: sideshowworld.com)
Today in class we watched Blacks on Vaudeville, a documentary on Vaudeville displaying its history and its correlation with minstrel shows. Minstrel shows, the poorly reenacted representation of how Black Americans, slaves, or "Negroes" entertained themselves during this time period. Beginning in 1843 and lasting till the mid-20th century, minstrel shows featuring musical and dance performances for crowds all over America (Minstrel Show, 2016).
Personally, I do not care for Vaudeville or minstrel shows either. As part of history I recognize minstrel shows as a point in Vaudeville's evolution, however, I cannot sit through a viewing without utter dismay. The shows reflect a point in time in which discrimination was very commended, with the specific goal of dehumanizing the Black American people.
The documentary highlighted the shows and its rising popularity in the 1840's. Before watching this segment, I had no idea that there were actually Black American minstrel performers. I always had the impression that it was a Caucasian person with black face, generating stereotypical propaganda to an all Caucasian crowd. To my surprise, I was wrong. Apparently the minstrel shows, featured some willing Black American participants, attendees and supporters. Understandably, for Black Americans at the time the wage was probably better than most paid positions, treatment was bearable, as well as the chance to perform on stage was rare. Some of these performers even used their talent, skills, and resistance to stereotyping to gain popularity amongst their community. As mentioned in the documentary, the Nicholas brothers are revered for doing just that.
The first minstrel performer to receive national recognition and have their performance considered that of a human was Bert Williams. In the documentary a frame shot is paused, displaying a quote by George Washington Carver, best known for developing a variety of uses for crops such as peanuts, then leading numerous speaking engagements as a symbol of African-American achievement (McMurry, 1991). The quote reads, "Bert Williams has done more for the race than I have. He's smiled his way into people's hearts" (Crazybluezzdaddy, 2012). As of 1910 he was the most respected comedians on the American stage and was the first Black American to be admired by people of all races. Overall, there is a collection of good stories of Black American performers leaving their impact on Vaudeville's history, however, those that were not featured are to be even more considered. With its racist and stereotypical motif, it is no wonder why minstrel shows began to disappear just as the civil rights movement started.
Below is a portion of the documentary by PBS, originally aired on November 26, 1997.
"minstrel show". Encyclopedia Britannica.Encyclopedia Britanncia Online. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2016. Web. 24 Feb. 2016
McMurry, Linda O. "George Washington Carver." History.com. A&E Television Networks, 1991. Web. 24 Feb. 2016.
Crazybluezzdaddy. "Blacks and Vaudeville: PBS Documentary." YouTube. YouTube, 29 May 2012. Web. 24 Feb. 2016.
Michel Foucault, philosopher, critic, theorist, historian and much more
(courtesy: i.ytimg.com)
The Panopticon does pose a good option for reforming inmates, addressing large crowds of people, and entertaining. On the other hand, there is a reason why the architecture has shifted from this style despite its effective results. The truth being that it is no longer practical to have structures constructed in this way is what left it as mere history. Nowadays there are too many prisoners incarcerated with far more creative ideas than in the nineteenth century. There are such things as human and civil rights that each prisoner is entitled to, which means they are granted time in "the yard". Even the most dangerous criminals in maximum security prisons are still allowed one hour of recreation out of their cell. During these times interactions with prison guards occur, whom could potentially be corrupt and aid in their escape. My point in mentioning all this, is that despite the genius of the architecture and its once revered use, has now become obsolete. Concert and lecture halls now have televisions and surround sound to mitigate the problems of vision and hearing in such cases.
Traffic cameras are a fine example of the advancement of surveillance ultimately limiting peoples free will and power. Without knowing who is watching, drivers must control their speed and driving habits as not to run through red lights. I personally do not agree with traffic or speeding cameras, due to the fact that it creates a stepping-stone for a society in which all actions are monitored by government agencies and large corporations. I understand the reason for implementing them, traffic accidents have gone down as a result, however, peoples psychological well-being should also be taken into account. A world where everything and everyone is monitored for the excuse of their "well-being" seems to be the plot for any sci-fi movie these days. With so many technological advancements occurring so frequently, I would not be surprised if events like the ones portrayed in the Terminator franchise. As the article stated,
As we naturalize rules, society could be said to become less willing to contest unjust laws.
This is a clear representation of blind faith with minimal questioning from society. So long as it does not affect or impact your life directly, nobody will raise attention. Thousands of people a month receive a ticket in the mail for a traffic violation that last decade would have gone unpunished. The problem does not lie with all drivers, just a small percentage, installing cameras at major traffic intersections and in close proximity of schools suggests all people are guilty of this habit. In other underdeveloped countries, the streets are lawless, with what seems like two as many drivers and motorists on the road yet there are the same if not less accidents. In most underdeveloped areas, there aren't even traffic lights let alone stop signs. There are many factors that contribute to this suggestion, like low horsepower capability yet, people seem to be more vigilant in my opinion.
The craving for more information could potentially lead to mans downfall. Many scenarios have been theorized in hypothetical situations in the form of films. One of these films is Ex Machina, the story of a man who is chosen to interact with a robot capable of artificial intelligence. The man was supposed to run a series of tests on the subject, then determine whether it was capable of passing as a human or not. Ultimately the mans urge to gain more information and sympathy for its confined state, led to his demise. The internet is one of the most impactful inventions to date, with its capability of linking individuals globally whom without it would most likely never interact otherwise.
The article "The World of Wrestling" by Roland Barthes brought an interesting topic to light, the difference between spectacle and demonstration of excellence. In regards to wrestling, its roots as a performance based entertainment draws attention to the dramatizations performed by the wrestlers as opposed to boxing, where a match is determined by a battle of skill and passion for the sport. Barthes identified a grave reality when comparing the two in the following quote.
"The logical conclusion of the contest does not interest the wrestling-fan, while on the
contrary a boxing-match always implies a science of the future."
What Barthes does best in stating such, is the outcome of both wrestling and boxing as well as their importance to its spectators. Personally, I grew up watching wrestling but never worried about who won so long as there was sufficient action. With the advent of the UFC and boxing ever more prevalent than in the recent years, boxing has received much more praise for its ability to attract all crowds. So therefore, I believe there is validity in Barthes viewpoint and statements to back it up. As mentioned in the reading, wrestling draws upon and shares elements of theatre. Suffering, defeat and justice as Barthes claims, can all be witnessed during a wrestling match, all while using the crowd's emotions to fuel the outcome.
Despite being predetermined matches, I would enjoy the Tables, Ladders and Chairs (TLC) matches. These always seemed to portray the more realistic violence than the proverbial punches or stomps. Fans have taken their own approach to the "sport" and have created backyard wrestling, which portrays similar themes, however, involves untrained participants who actually sustain real injuries. Many popular television shows such as Tosh.0 or Ridiculousness have aired home videos that have shown such events. Pop culture has also taken their approach at the modern day perception of the spectacle. South Park and Workaholics have parodied the theatrics of wrestling highlighting the outrageous backstories that the wrestlers direct to the audience and the whimsical gullibility of their audience. Overall, my take on wrestling is a negative perception, however, it is difficult to ignore because it is a multi-million dollar industry.
Art & Technology clash, an ongoing topic for discussion
(Courtesy: The University of Iowa)
Hey! I am Matthew Chang. I am an International Business and Management major taking this course as it seemed most concurrent with the advancement of art as opposed to the many others. Art is not one of my strong suits, however, I do favor music and drawing when I have free time. Hopefully there will be time to cover these areas throughout the semester.
My first thoughts before beginning class was that it would follow the same constructs as any other art class I have previously taken. In high school and prior to that, the course would cover topics that were determined by a board of educators that deemed particular content important. More often than not, there would not be room for additional material chosen by students in the lesson plan.
Upon arriving to class and listening to Professor Thompson, I knew this would not be the case. She made it fundamentally clear that what we learn in class would be relevant to our daily lives and the influences it draws upon. I am particularly excited to see how art has evolved from its most basic form to its most modern representation.
After concluding our first meeting, I left with a great sense of relief knowing that the class is instructed by a professor with an unconventional way of teaching. This creative approach will surely breach the gap that many other professors have a difficult time overcoming with their students.
The story of Dr. Cuero is a fine addition to the classic tales of struggling at an early age, striving for greatness and eventually achieving it. With 9 scientific inventions claimed in his name, it is no wonder why he is considered a revered microbiologist. His invention of a product that helps clean up oil after spills and discovery of a process, stimulating anti-oxidant production in plants are extremely helpful to many businesses as well as applicable towards an environmental effort. I agree with Dr. Cuero, in that to be creative you need to exceed preconceived notions of you by innovating and changing expectations. Many born into luxury are at a disadvantage as they are not challenged to find solutions to life's most basic obstacles, leaving them with only the most challenging which are left incomplete or unsolved. Learning inductively, new knowledge, is imperative for growth in addition to advancement of our society. His interview with Patricia Ross made it clear that many obstacles can be overcome as long as the individual sets realistic goals without the fear of failing and interacts with their surroundings creating new ways of thinking.
So far it seems to be a good start to the spring semester, I am looking forward to the next class.
